1
or somewhat left
リ
Another point in which the Hong Kong Ordinances differ from those of the Straits, is that in the latter the "Service" system of classification which has been adopted has been carried out (in Hong Kong) in its simplicity while the "Departmental" classification is dislocated by a cross-classification according to "Vote". For instance the Expenditure of the Colonial Secretary's Department in Hong Kong is given in page I as $111,816, but to...
* It would appear from Par. 3 of Sir R. MacDonnell's Report that under the Departmental grouping the excess of Comptroller's expenditure in 1868 is only $37,000, while under the "Service" grouping it would be $286,000! There surely must be some mistake here. The Straits Expenditure is nearly double that of Hong Kong, yet the Detailed Expenditure for 1868 amounts to only $89,000, while the Expenditure under the "Service" groups is only $33,000.
To this have to be added, from page ..., column 1, the sums of $9,200, $2,400, $1,920, $1,940 and $1,344.
20
This appears to be a defect. Working out the Expenditure into sections in accordance with the authorities under which it is sanctioned is confusing, as the practice of breaking up the Expenditure into sections...
Whether particular items of Expenditure rest upon Civil List or Pension Ordinance, special Ordinances, or the annual Supply Ordinance, they should all be arranged in their proper order in the general Estimates. This has been laid down again and again by the Secretary of State, by whom it has also been decided that whenever the whole of the Expenditure does not...
1
or somewhat left
リ
Another point in which the
HongKong Potrinates differ from shove
of the Straits, is that in the latter the
the
"Service" system of clasification which has been adopted how been carried out
Hongtong) in its simplicity while at Departmental" clasification is dislocated: by a crefs-classification according to "Valor, For instance the Expenditure of the Colonial Secretary's Department thongtong
given in prage I as $111,816, but to
دند
ت
* It would appear from Par. 3 of Sur M
ar from Par. : of Sir R. MacDonnell = Report that under the Departmental "; grouping the exces of Comprenditione 1868 is only $37.000, while under the Service" grouping
it would be $286,000! There sinely must be some mistake here. The Straits Expenditure is nearly dumble that of Hongthing, yet the Detailed Excesor 1868 amount
to
only $89,000, while the Ineces
groups is only $33.000.
under the Service
this have to be added, from page
column 1, the
Dummi
of $9,200, $2,400,
$1,920, $1,940 and $1344.
20
to be
This
apper
9.
599
{ AAO
defect. Working
to
confusing as the practice of breathing
up thee Expenditive into section
in
accordance with the anchorities under which it is sanctioned. Whester particular items of Expenditive rest upon
Civil List or Pension Ordinanc
کیا ترکی
ته
special
Ordinances, or the annual supply ordinance,
shey should all be
arranged) general Estimates.
I in their
proper order in the This has been laid down
again and
again by the Secretary of State, by whom
it has also been decided that whenever. the whole of the Expenditure dow not ret
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.